Local governments can proactively manage future growth by applying community utility principles for development to large rural plots. If the country is owned by the government or if it has been developed under an agreement with the local government, officials may include the benefits of the Community in tenders. The Kingsbridge affair began with plans to redevelop an empty weapons building. Built in 1917 for military training purposes, the Armory kingsbridge comprises a massive 180,000 square metre drilling hall with an uninterrupted wingspan of structural steel and no internal support columns. The armory was handed over to New York City in the 1990s and largely abandoned. Pending the transfer of the armoury to city property, the Kingsbridge Armory Redevelopment Alliance (KARA) was established in the late 1980s to bring together different interest groups from the municipality to ensure that the economic benefits of weapon rehabilitation remain in the community. KARA was organized and occupied by the Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition, a group of community organizations established in 1974. It took a lot of time and effort – 17 years of community organizing and dozens of hours of mutual legal assistance from lawyers for local economic development on the coalition side, and an equal amount of work from developers – to come up with a CBA. The application of the conditions over the next 99 years (duration of the agreement) also requires constant effort and work.
Ultimately, the involvement of a Community coalition in decisions on the distribution of economic benefits among Community stakeholders is very powerful. Given the representativeness of the coalition – 25 organizations were signatories – the CBA has the potential to benefit future generations of Bronx residents. Applicability. A CBA can ensure that a developer`s community benefits promises are legally enforceable. Developers who “pitch” a project often make promises that are never written into project authorization documents, and even if they are, they may not be monitored and enforced by the relevant government authorities. The establishment of an implementation mechanism or the broadening of the class of parties to implement these promises can greatly facilitate the implementation of SAAs. Elected officials and government authorities often play an active role in the negotiations on the CBA. In California and other countries where development agreements are approved, government officials may be formal signatories to the CBA. In other cases, government officials may play a more informal role in facilitating negotiations on the CBA and fostering cooperation.  CBAs focus on local and government officials: with governments needing the support of their constituencies and developers needing state support for issues such as area permits, developers have a clear incentive to consider community interests. When synergistic development models such as CBAs are used, developers pose a lower risk and communities benefit from improved cost-benefit positions.
The BCAs thus reinforce each other, as the three groups of demands win, although unique. CBAs enable a win-win approach to development: judicious communication in advance between the developer and a broad community coalition reduces developer risk while maximizing the positive impact of development on local residents and the economy. The developer has active community support for the project, and community members benefit if the project meets their needs. So are Community fund agreements beneficial for communities? Based on the Kingsbridge National Ice Centre`s CBA case study, the answer is yes: BCAs can benefit municipalities if an inclusive and representative community coalition negotiates with a developer to obtain a mandatory CBA without government as a party to the agreement. . . .